Medication Errors

Medical errors: the importance of the bullet’s blunt end

2011; 170(2): 251–252.
Published online 2010 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1283-7
PMCID: PMC3022157
PMID: 20809247

Medical errors are substantial causes of hospital-related morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that preventable medical errors alone cause up to 98,000 annual deaths in the United States—the daily equivalent of one fatal jumbo jet crash []. Preventable adverse events and accidents impose a great burden on patients and on the health care system []. The finding that medical care in itself may generate harm—sometimes fatal and sometimes persistent—has caused real shockwaves of worrying. The society is not likely to tolerate major accidents in a technologically high standing and expensive activity that is mastered by highly trained professionals and that is intended to heal and not to harm []. The adagium primum non nocere (first, do not harm) is one of the principal ethical precepts taught in medical school. However, both unpretentiousness as well as righteous realism point out that in medicine, like in any professional activity, adverse events and accidents may be part of daily practice. Ignoring the fact that also in medicine, Errare humanum est (to err is human) or remaining indifferent to its relevance is nothing less than a sign of dramatic irresponsibility.

Children may be particularly at risk for medical harm. Dependency, limited communication skills, immature anatomy and physiology, the need for age- or weight-adapted equipment, and the need for dosing calculations have all been suggested as potential risk factors []. In technically complex health care systems, children’s vulnerability may still be more pronounced. In this issue, Niesse et al. report their analysis of critical incidents (CI) in severely ill children admitted to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) []. Prospectively collected (near) incidents were compared to retrospectively assessed patient data. By use of logistic regression analysis, mechanical ventilation, male gender, and length of stay were identified as significant predictors for the occurrence of (near) incidents. In theory, these finding are interesting, but their practical value remains limited. At first, the three independent predictors that were characterized can hardly be regarded as potential targets for improvement strategies. None of them can effectively be changed or avoided, except by a policy that prevents PICU admissions in general or intubations and invasive ventilation in particular. Recent advances in high-flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation may partially help to prevent the latter, although these techniques will certainly be associated with their own risk profile. Second, there is no doubt that within a population of sick children, some will be more prone to CIs than others. Recognizing this difference may help in the triage of pediatric patients to the safest possible care. However, since any PICU patient is subject to complex medical care involving many professionals and technical interventions, they all must be considered as being de facto at risk for CIs. This makes it less interesting to identify more precisely those patients who have higher risks, unless one was able to divide the PICU population in, respectively, “no risk at all” and “at risk” subgroups. Since all PICU patients are at risk and individual risk profile may change over time, a CI preventive strategy should be applied to the total population and at all times.

Niesse et al. nicely illustrate the traditional “sharp-end” approach to medical errors by attributing them to directly observable factors on the spot of the actual accident. Although this may work for simple, straightforward systems, it will be insufficient to deal with errors occurring in highly complex systems like medicine. Causes of errors can be situated in individual patients and individual professionals but just as much in factors that are more distant or even unobservably far from the actual working context. Examples of these “blunt end”-situated factors are working conditions (e.g., availability and content of protocols, workload, fatigue due to excessive working hours, professional relations, communication, work atmosphere, importance of hierarchy, reluctance or resistance to report malpractice, etc.), the local policy (e.g., choices of material, lack of appropriate tools, and retrenchments in expenditure), and even legislation. In complex systems, also a “blunt-end” approach is needed in order to reveal the underlying system defect that allowed the opportunity for the error to occur.

A corner stone of quality improvement and error reduction in a “blunt-end” approach is the availability of a continuous and easily accessible tool for error reporting. Niesse et al. nicely illustrate the usefulness of a blame-free CI-reporting system in identifying incidence and characteristics of common CIs. Provider-reported data may have important eye-opening and problem-elucidating effects by offering the opportunities to understand factors that contribute to or prevent harm to patients. Error reporting may lead to the creation of customized interventions that effectively reduce the incidence of errors []. In order to make error reporting profitable, some essential preconditions should be fulfilled.

First, the reporting system should apply a low threshold. This means that also near incidents and minor incidents must be reported. Based on experience in high technological industries (e.g., oil industry and civil aviation), it is now widely accepted that it makes more sense to screen systematically for (the much more common) near incidents than to focus only on the analysis of obvious severe accidents. It has been shown that most preventive system changes come from minor incidents that occurred repeatedly over long periods []. In my own experience, handling a low threshold also helps professionals to gain experience in dealing with adverse events. This may create an open-debate culture in which reporting (near) incidents becomes an evident part of daily practice.

Second, error reporting should be blame-free. Traditionally, errors are “sharp-end-wise” attributed to individual mistakes, and blamed professionals may be subject to penalization. However, true negligence or guilty neglect is only rarely the major cause of a medical error. Errors need to be considered as system-based phenomena, which are—de facto—impossible to eradicate completely. In order to make the complex medical system safer, it is therefore essential to uncover in time any defects that may lead to major accidents within the foreseeable future. A system that permits admitting errors honestly is more likely to achieve this goal, compared to a punitive approach []. Reporting errors should be encouraged as a sign of professionalism and responsibility. Blame-free reporting does not mean that professionals are released from the duty to deliver excellent medical care at all times. Neither should it be considered as an excuse for neglect or negligence.

Third, error reporting should be applied to all levels and professions involved in the patient care and in all possible directions. The most junior team member must be able to correct a senior consultant or to report errors that have been made by superiors, without running the risk of retaliation. This will often require proper teamwork and flattening of existing hierarchies.

Finally, error reporting cannot be an isolated activity. Reported errors must be discussed within a multidisciplinary surveillance group that analyzes the reported (near) incidents, identifies critical situations or processes, implements initiatives for improvement, gives systematic feedback to the front-line professional, and continuously generates incentives for effective reporting by professionals. In addition, health care authorities, both institutional as well as political, must be prepared to accept the consequences of a system-based approach of dealing with medical errors. The failure to improve blunt end-situated causes of medical errors will cause frustration amongst health care workers in the short term and certainly to patient harm in the long term.

References:

1. Begley S (2008) Go to the hospital at your own risk. Newsweek April 2008
2. Cimino MA, Kirschbaum MS, Brodsky L, Shaha SH. Assessing medication prescribing errors in pediatric intensive care units. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5(2):124–132. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000112371.26138.E8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
3. Dickey J, Damiano RJ, Jr, Ungerleider R. Our surgical culture of blame: a time for change. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1259–1260. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01195-4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
4. Frey B, Buettiker V, Hug MI, Waldvogel K, Gessler P, et al. Does critical incident reporting contribute to medication error prevention? Eur J Pediatr. 2002;161(11):594–599. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-1055-0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
5. Miller MR, Zhan C. Pediatric patient safety in hospitals: a national picture in 2000. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6):1741–1746. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1741. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
6. Niesse OW, Sennhauser FH, Frey B (2010) Critical incidents in paediatric critical care: who is at risk?. Eur J Pediatr. [PubMed]
7. Skapik JL, Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Thompson DA, et al. Pediatric safety incidents from an intensive care reporting system. J Patient Saf. 2009;5(2):95–101. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181a70c68. [PubMed] [CrossRef] []
8. Walsh AP, Baum JD, Walsh DJ. Flight plans, patient safety and American hospitals—is it time to check the baggage of private sector oversight? J R Soc Med. 2010;103(6):215. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.100108. [PMC free article] [PubMed][]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022157/

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-05-27T15:43:57+00:00May 27th, 2024|Articles, Medication Errors|

To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000.

Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Experts estimate that as many as 98,000 people die in any given year from medical errors that occur in hospitals. That’s more than die from motor vehicle accidents, breast cancer, or AIDS–three causes that receive far more public attention. Indeed, more people die annually from medication errors than from workplace injuries. Add the financial cost to the human tragedy, and medical error easily rises to the top ranks of urgent, widespread public problems.

To Err Is Human breaks the silence that has surrounded medical errors and their consequence–but not by pointing fingers at caring health care professionals who make honest mistakes. After all, to err is human. Instead, this book sets forth a national agenda–with state and local implications–for reducing medical errors and improving patient safety through the design of a safer health system.

This volume reveals the often startling statistics of medical error and the disparity between the incidence of error and public perception of it, given many patients’ expectations that the medical profession always performs perfectly. A careful examination is made of how the surrounding forces of legislation, regulation, and market activity influence the quality of care provided by health care organizations and then looks at their handling of medical mistakes.

Using a detailed case study, the book reviews the current understanding of why these mistakes happen. A key theme is that legitimate liability concerns discourage reporting of errors–which begs the question, “How can we learn from our mistakes?”

Balancing regulatory versus market-based initiatives and public versus private efforts, the Institute of Medicine presents wide-ranging recommendations for improving patient safety, in the areas of leadership, improved data collection and analysis, and development of effective systems at the level of direct patient care.

To Err Is Human asserts that the problem is not bad people in health care–it is that good people are working in bad systems that need to be made safer. Comprehensive and straightforward, this book offers a clear prescription for raising the level of patient safety in American health care. It also explains how patients themselves can influence the quality of care that they receive once they check into the hospital. This book will be vitally important to federal, state, and local health policy makers and regulators, health professional licensing officials, hospital administrators, medical educators and students, health caregivers, health journalists, patient advocates–as well as patients themselves.

First in a series of publications from the Quality of Health Care in America, a project initiated by the Institute of Medicine

National Academies

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-05-27T15:41:24+00:00January 20th, 2024|Articles, Medication Errors|

The health care industry needs to be more honest about medical errors.

Kathleen Sutcliffe is a Bloomberg Distinguished Professor at Johns Hopkins University and the co-author of a forthcoming book Still Not Safe: Patient Safety and the Middle-Managing of American Medicine (Oxford University Press).

Twenty years ago this fall, the Institute of Medicine—an U.S.-based independent, nongovernmental organization widely regarded as an authority at the intersection of medicine and society—released a report titled “To Err Is Human.” It announced that up to 98,000 Americans were dying each year from medical errors.

Official and popular reaction was swift. Congress mandated the monitoring of progress in efforts to prevent patient harm, and the health care industry set grand goals, such as reducing medical errors by 50% within five years. News outlets reported on the proceedings closely. A remedy for a longstanding problem seemed in sight.

Yet, in 2019, medical errors are about as prevalent as in 1999. “To Err Is Human” was an uneasy read; so is a September 2019 report on patient safety from the World Health Organization. Among WHO’s findings: Globally, hospital-acquired infections afflict about 10% of hospitalized patients. Medical errors harm some 40% of patients in primary and outpatient care. Diagnostic and medication errors hurt millions, and cost billions of dollars every year.

So, two decades on, why this chronic state of risk in health care?

The chain reaction to the 1999 report spent its energy quickly. Contrary to the report’s calls for expertise from outside the medical profession, patient safety was taken over by clinician managers and other health care administrators whose interests would hardly have been served by a thorough consideration of the crisis that would have rattled the status quo. These institutional leaders also brushed off experts (psychologists, sociologists, and organizational behaviorists, among others) who have long offered innovative ideas for improving safety and reducing health care mishaps.

The medical managers had ideas, too, but those amounted to localized—and weak—prescriptions like safety checklists, hand-sanitizing stations, posters promoting “a culture of safety,” and programs inviting low-level staff members to speak up and speak their minds to their supervisors. Absent were innovations aimed at bigger classes of hazards beyond the scope of even large, multi-hospital systems such as resolving problems like look-alike, sound-alike drugs, or of confusing and error-inducing interfaces in technology.

Look-alike sound-alike drugs are medications that have spelling similarities or are visually similar in physical appearance or packaging. For example, mixups in the medications “epinephrine” and “ephedrine” have led to much patient harm. The drug names look similar and are sometimes stored close to each other. But each drug has a different purpose and can have serious adverse and even deadly effects if administered incorrectly. Error-inducing technology interfaces occur when simple technology connecting devices fit multiple tubes, outlets, or machines, increasing the possibility of misconnections. For example, when a feeding tube is mistakenly coupled with a tube that enters a vein, or an IV tube is inadvertently connected to the nasal oxygen.

Patient safety can be tricky to define, because it’s essentially a non-event. When things are going well, no one wonders why. When a mistake occurs and threatens the unrealistic “getting-to-zero” goal of many health care managers, then it becomes an event that demands a reaction. And the reaction generally is to assign blame to people further down the organizational ladder.

It’s far easier, after all, for the industry to fault individual workers on the front lines of medical care than to scrutinize inherent organization and system flaws, or to finger highly paid specialist doctors. In the current approach to patient safety, the focus—on who did wrong and how they did wrong—is misplaced. Instead, it should be on what’s going right and what lessons can be learned from those successes.

This is how health care organizations and the industry as a whole avoid dealing with the troubling task of identifying root causes of the patient-safety problem. Meanwhile, the public is assured there is little to fear (and little need for external intervention), because, after all, health care professionals are on the job.

But clinician leaders and hospital administrators in charge of the industry need to realize that health care, including its patient safety component, is too big and too complex to be steered by medical professionals only. We live in an era of multifaceted problems that call for multidisciplinary approaches. Advances in anesthesia safety, for example, would not have come without the input of engineers. Experts with perspectives from outside of medicine should be welcomed to any serious discussion of how to improve patient safety, and their insights heeded.

Let the words of human-factors engineering pioneer John Senders help guide a truly reformed patient safety movement: “Human error in medicine, and the adverse events that may follow, are problems of psychology and engineering, not of medicine.”

An important social movement seemed to emerge in the wake of “To Err Is Human,” but it has lost its way. By being bolder and more comprehensive in its goal setting, and by embracing the acumen of experts from outside the medical profession, the health care industry could make patient safety the great social movement it deserves to be.

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-05-27T15:41:44+00:00January 20th, 2024|Articles, Medication Errors|

How to Prevent Medication Errors

Preventing Medication Errors

medication errors medical malpractice attorney oklahoma cityMedication errors are a common issue in healthcare and cost billions of dollars nationwide while inflicting significant morbidity and mortality.

While national attention has been paid to errors in medication dispensing issues, it remains a widespread problem. The best method to enhance patient safety is to develop a multi-faceted strategy for education and prevention. Emphasis should be put on healthcare providers working as a team and communicating as well as encouraging patients to be more informed about their medications. With a culture of safety, dispensing medication errors can be reduced.

Some ways to prevent medication errors

  • Always write one prescription for each medication.
  • Besides signing the prescription, always circle your name on the preprinted prescription pad.
  • Do not hesitate to check the dose and frequency if you are not sure.
  • Always consider the fact that each medication has the potential for adverse reactions.
  • Do not use drug abbreviations when writing orders.
  • Always add the patient’s age and weight to each prescription.
  • Check for liver and renal function before ordering any medication.
  • Spell out the frequency and route of dosage; do not use abbreviations.
  • Always specify the duration of therapy; do not say give out “XXX” number of pills.
  • Always be aware of high-risk medications.
  • When writing a prescription, state the condition being treated.

Source: National Library of Medicine

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2023-10-09T19:39:25+00:00April 10th, 2023|Articles, Medication Errors|

Medical Error Reduction and Prevention

In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan.
.

medication errorsMedical errors are a serious public health problem and a leading cause of death in the United States. It is challenging to uncover a consistent cause of errors and, even if found, to provide a consistent viable solution that minimizes the chances of a recurrent event. By recognizing untoward events occur, learning from them, and working toward preventing them, patient safety can be improved.

Part of the solution is to maintain a culture that works toward recognizing safety challenges and implementing viable solutions rather than harboring a culture of blame, shame, and punishment. Healthcare organizations need to establish a culture of safety that focuses on system improvement by viewing medical errors as challenges that must be overcome. All individuals on the healthcare team must play a role in making the provision of healthcare safer for patients and healthcare workers.

All providers know medical errors create a serious public health problem that poses a substantial threat to patient safety. Yet, one of the most challenging unanswered questions is “What constitutes a medical error?” The answer to this basic question has not been clearly established. Due to unclear definitions, “medical errors” are difficult to scientifically measure. A lack of standardized nomenclature and overlapping definitions of medical errors has hindered data analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.

There are two major types of errors:

  1. Errors of omission occur as a result of actions not taken. Examples are not strapping a patient into a wheelchair or not stabilizing a gurney prior to patient transfer.
  2. Errors of the commission occur as a result of the wrong action taken. Examples include administering a medication to which a patient has a known allergy or not labeling a laboratory specimen that is subsequently ascribed to the wrong patient.

Health care professionals experience profound psychological effects such as anger, guilt, inadequacy, depression, and suicide due to real or perceived errors. The threat of impending legal action may compound these feelings. This can also lead to a loss of clinical confidence. Clinicians equate errors with failure, with a breach of public trust, and with harming patients despite their mandate to “first do no harm.”

Fear of punishment makes healthcare professionals reluctant to report errors. While they fear for patients’ safety, they also dread disciplinary action, including the fear of losing their jobs if they report an incident. Unfortunately, failing to report contributes to the likelihood of serious patient harm. Many healthcare institutions have rigid policies in place that also create an adversarial environment. This can cause staff to hesitate to report an error, minimize the problem, or even fail to document the issue. These actions or lack thereof can contribute to an evolving cycle of medical errors. When these errors come to light, they can tarnish the reputation of the healthcare institution and the workers.

Some experts hold that the term “error” is excessively negative, antagonistic and perpetuates a culture of blame. A professional whose confidence and morale has been damaged as a result of an error may work less effectively and may abandon a career in medicine. Many experts suggest the term “error” should not be used at all. Due to the negative connotation, it is prudent to limit the use of the term “error” when documenting in the public medical record. However, adverse patient outcomes may occur because of errors; to delete the term obscures the goal of preventing and managing its causes and effects.

Errors, no matter the nomenclature, typically occur from the convergence of multiple contributing factors. Public and legislative intolerance for medical errors typically illustrates a lack of understanding that some errors may not, in fact, be preventable with current technology or the resources available to the practitioner. Human factors are always a problem, and identifying errors permits improvement strategies to be undertaken. In particular, blaming or punishing individuals for errors due to systemic causes does not address the causes nor prevent a repetition of the error. The trend is for patient safety experts to focus on improving the safety of health care systems to reduce the probability of errors and mitigate their effects rather than focus on an individual’s actions. Errors represent an opportunity for constructive changes and improved education in health care delivery.

Governmental, legal, and medical institutions must work collaboratively to remove the culture of blame while retaining accountability. When this challenge is met, health care institutions will not be constrained from measuring targets for process improvement, including all errors, even with adverse outcomes.

Healthcare providers want to improve outcomes while reducing the risk of patient harm. Despite provider best efforts, medical error rates remain high with significant disability and death. Preventable medical errors contribute substantially to healthcare costs, including higher health insurance costs per person expenses. Only by health professionals working together will the cost and injury associated with medical errors be mitigated.

Source: National Library of Medicine

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-01-19T22:24:46+00:00April 7th, 2023|Articles, Medication Errors|

Medication Error

Source: National Library of Medicine: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/

Rayhan A. Tariq; Rishik Vashisht; Ankur Sinha; Yevgeniya Scherbak.

July 3, 2022.

Medication Error Definition

While there is no uniform definition of a medication error, The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention defines a medication error as: “… any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm while the medication is in the control of the healthcare professional, patient, or consumer. Such events may be related to professional practice, health care products, procedures, and systems, including prescribing; order communication; product labeling, packaging, and nomenclature; compounding; dispensing; distribution; administration; education; monitoring; and use.” However, there is no widely accepted uniform definition. Unfortunately, untoward medical errors and underreported medication errors result in significant morbidity and mortality.

Medication errors can occur at many steps in patient care, from ordering the medication to the time when the patient is administered the drug. In general, medication errors usually occur at one of these points:

  • Ordering/prescribing
  • Documenting
  • Transcribing
  • Dispensing
  • Administering
  • Monitoring

Medication errors are most common at the ordering or prescribing stage. Typical errors include the healthcare provider writing the wrong medication, the wrong route or dose, or the wrong frequency. These ordering errors account for almost 50% of medication errors. Data show that nurses and pharmacists identify anywhere from 30% to 70% of medication-ordering errors. It is obvious that medication errors are a pervasive problem, but the problem is preventable in most cases.

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-01-19T22:26:10+00:00February 9th, 2023|Articles, Medication Errors|

Medication Dispensing Errors And Prevention

okc medical malpractice attorneyRayhan A. Tariq; Rishik Vashisht; Ankur Sinha; Yevgeniya Scherbak.

Source: National Library of Medicine – www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065

Last Update: July 3, 2022.

Close to 6,800 prescription medications and countless over-the-counter drugs are available in the United States. To further complicate a practitioner’s responsibility during patient care, there are thousands of health supplements, herbs, potions, and lotions used by the public regularly to treat their health problems. With the number of substances on the market, it is conceivable that mistakes can be made when practitioners prescribe or dispense drugs. Added to this is the high risk of interaction between substances.

Each year, in the United States alone, 7,000 to 9,000 people die due to a medication error. Additionally, hundreds of thousands of other patients experience but often do not report an adverse reaction or other complications related to a medication. The total cost of looking after patients with medication-associated errors exceeds $40 billion each year, with over 7 million patients affected. In addition to the monetary cost, patients experience psychological and physical pain and suffering as a result of medication errors. Finally, a major consequence of medication errors is that it leads to decreased patient satisfaction and a growing lack of trust in the healthcare system.

The most common reasons for errors include failure to communicate drug orders, illegible handwriting, wrong drug selection chosen from a drop-down menu, confusion over similarly named drugs, confusion over similar packaging between products, or errors involving dosing units or weight. Medication errors may be due to human errors, but it often results from a flawed system with inadequate backup to detect mistakes.

Objectives:

  • Identify the most common errors related to medications.
  • Review some of the critical points at which medication errors are most likely to occur.
  • Outline some strategies to prevent medication errors from occurring.
  • Summarize interprofessional team strategies for decreasing medication errors.

Issues of Concern

Medication errors are grouped by different taxonomies by the Joint Commission, World Health Organization, and The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention.

Some taxonomies consider the source of the error:

  • Deteriorated drug error from compromised storage
  • Drug utilization process errors from the administration, dispensing, or monitoring
  • Prescribing errors

The most common system failures include:

  • Inaccurate order transcription
  • Drug knowledge dissemination
  • Failing to obtain allergy history
  • Incomplete order checking
  • Mistakes the tracking of the medication orders
  • Poor professional communication
  • Unavailability or inaccurate patient information

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, to better standardize medication reporting, developed the Common Formats, which are defined data elements collected and reported in the event of a medication error through the Patient Safety Organization Privacy Protection Center. The scope of the Common Formats encompasses all errors, including events that those that have the potential to affect the patient, near-misses, and those that have a patient effect.

Full Article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-01-19T22:27:18+00:00February 9th, 2023|Articles, Medication Errors|

Medication Misadventure

Source: National Library of Medicine: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/

Rayhan A. Tariq; Rishik Vashisht; Ankur Sinha; Yevgeniya Scherbak.

July 3, 2022.

Medication Misadventure

A medication misadventure is an iatrogenic incident that is inherent to medication therapy. Medication misadventure includes medication errors, adverse drug reactions, and adverse drug events. It is created through omission or commission of medication administration. Medication misadventures always are undesirable and unexpected; they may or may not be independent of preexisting pathology; and might be due to human or system error, idiosyncratic, or immunologic response.

Medication errors can occur at many steps in patient care, from ordering the medication to the time when the patient is administered the drug. In general, medication errors usually occur at one of these points:

  • Ordering/prescribing
  • Documenting
  • Transcribing
  • Dispensing
  • Administering
  • Monitoring

Medication errors are most common at the ordering or prescribing stage. Typical errors include the healthcare provider writing the wrong medication, the wrong route or dose, or the wrong frequency. These ordering errors account for almost 50% of medication errors. Data show that nurses and pharmacists identify anywhere from 30% to 70% of medication-ordering errors. It is obvious that medication errors are a pervasive problem, but the problem is preventable in most cases.

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2023-10-09T19:39:27+00:00February 1st, 2023|Articles, Medication Errors|

Causes of Medication Errors

okc law firm medical malpractice

Source: National Library of Medicine: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/

Rayhan A. Tariq; Rishik Vashisht; Ankur Sinha; Yevgeniya Scherbak.

July 3, 2022.

Causes of Medication Errors

Expired Product

Usually occurs due to improper storage of preparations resulting in deterioration or use of expired products.

Incorrect Duration

Duration errors occur when medication is received for a longer or shorter period of time than prescribed.

Incorrect Preparation

This error usually occurs with compounding or some other type of preparation before the final administration. An example is choosing the incorrect diluent to reconstitute.

Incorrect Strength

Incorrect strength may potentially occur at many points in the medication process. It usually occurs due to human error when similar bottles or syringes with the incorrect strength is selected.

Incorrect Rate

Most often occurs with medications that are given as IV push or infusions. This is particularly dangerous with many drugs and may result in significant adverse drug reactions. Examples include tachycardia due to rapid IV epinephrine or red man syndrome due to the rapid administration of vancomycin.

Incorrect Timing 

In both home and institutional settings, it is challenging to be completely accurate with scheduled doses. The concern is that some medication’s absorption is significantly altered if taken with or without food. As such, it is important to adhere to scheduled times as commonly; this may lead to under or overdosing.

Incorrect Dose

This error includes overdose, underdose, and an extra dose. An incorrect dose occurs when an inappropriate or different medication dose is given other than what was ordered, errors of omission when a scheduled dose of medication is not given, and when a drug is given via an incorrect route. Errors due to incorrect routes usually occur due to unclear labeling or tubing that is adaptive to multiple connectors/lines of access. Incorrect routes often result in result in significant morbidity and mortality.

Incorrect Dosage Form

This occurs when a patient receives a dosage form different than prescribed, such as immediate-release instead of extended-release.

Incorrect Patient Action

This occurs when a patient takes a medication inappropriately. Patient education is the only way to prevent this type of error.

Known Allergen

Dispensing a drug that the patient has an allergy often due to failure to communicate with the patient, inappropriate chart review, inaccurate charting, or lack of technological interface.

Known Contraindication

This occurs when medications are not vigilantly reviewed for drug-drug, drug-disease, or drug-nutrient interactions.

Pharmacist

Errors by pharmacists are usually judgmental or mechanical. Judgmental errors include failure to detect drug interactions, inadequate drug utilization review, inappropriate screening, failure to counsel the patient appropriately, and inappropriate monitoring. A mechanical error is a mistake in dispensing or preparing a prescription, such as administering an incorrect drug or dose, giving improper directions, or dispensing the incorrect dose, quantity, or strength.

The most common causes involve workload, similar drug names, interruptions, lack of support staff, insufficient time to counsel patients, and illegible handwriting.

Distractions

One of the major causes of medication errors is distraction. Nearly 75% of medication errors have been attributed to this cause. Physicians have many duties in a hospital (e.g., examining patients, ordering laboratory and imaging studies, speaking to consultants, rounding on their patients, speaking to patient family members, conversing with insurance carriers before ordering studies), and in the midst of all this, they are often asked to write drug orders and prescriptions. In the rush to be done with writing drug orders, sometimes a lapse of judgment develops, and a medication error occurs. It can happen to the best physician. Sometimes the physician may be on the phone, and a clinician may be standing with the order chart next to him or her asking for a drug order. The physician may quickly scribble in a drug order, not paying attention to the dose or frequency. It is the unscheduled events in the life of a healthcare provider such as the constant pages, attendance at meetings, and answering telephone calls that disrupt patient care. Many physicians do not acknowledge that these distractions are a problem, but in reality, these distractions are often the cause of medication errors.

To minimize distractions, hospitals have introduced measures to reduce medication errors. Most hospitals are working on ways to decrease distractions to ensure that medication orders do not occur. For example, physicians are urged to order drugs at a set time after rounding on their patients; this is when they also write their daily progress notes. Other clinicians are requested not to disturb the physician at this time of the day. Also, clinicians are asked only to disrupt the physician for an emergency. Physicians are being urged to develop a structure for their patient care that is organized so that distractions are limited. While answering a page is often necessary, many hospitals recommend that physicians not answer patient calls until patient duties are completed. Additionally, healthcare institutions are now penalizing physicians who continue to have too many medication errors because of distractions; the result is a restriction in prescribing privileges.

Of course, not all distractions can be eliminated because the practice of medicine is itself unpredictable and chaotic at the best of times.

Distortions

A prevalent cause of medication errors is distortions. The majority of distortions may originate from poor writing, misunderstood symbols, the use of abbreviations, or improper translation. A significant number of healthcare providers in the United States are from foreign countries and often write orders for medications that are not even available domestically. When a practitioner questions the drug, the physician often asks the nurse or pharmacist to substitute the medication prescribed for a similar drug. This type of distortion can lead to major errors because neither the non-prescribing practitioner nor the pharmacist can substitute a drug. All hospital pharmacies have a list of medications available in the formulary, and doctors should know what is available and limit the ordering from this list.

Illegible Writing

Illegible writing has plagued both nurses and pharmacists for decades. Physicians are often in a hurry and frequently scribble down orders that are not legible; this often results in major medication mistakes. Taking shortcuts in writing drug orders is a prescription for a lawsuit. Often the practitioner or the pharmacist is not able to read the order and makes their best guess. If the drug required is a dire emergency, this also adds more risk to the patient. To eliminate such errors, most hospitals have rules that practitioners and pharmacists have to follow; if the drug order is illegible, the physician must be called and asked to rewrite the order clearly. The practitioner or the pharmacist should never guess what the drug/dose is. The bad writing by physicians has become such a major problem that the Institute of Safe Medication Practices has recommended the complete elimination of handwritten orders and prescriptions. This problem has been resolved using electronic records where everything is typed, and poor writing is no longer an issue; however, errors still can occur from writing the wrong drug, dose, or frequency.

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-01-19T22:28:47+00:00January 28th, 2023|Articles, Medication Errors|

The Different Types of Medication Errors

Source: National Library of Medicine: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/

Rayhan A. Tariq; Rishik Vashisht; Ankur Sinha; Yevgeniya Scherbak.

July 3, 2022.

Types of Medication Errors

  • Prescribing
  • Omission
  • Wrong time
  • Unauthorized drug
  • Improper dose
  • Wrong dose prescription/wrong dose preparation
  • Administration errors include the incorrect route of administration, giving the drug to the wrong patient, extra dose, or wrong rate
  • Monitoring errors such as failing to take into account patient liver and renal function, failing to document allergy or potential for drug interaction
  • Compliance errors such as not following protocol or rules established for dispensing and prescribing medications

Clinical Significance

Medication errors are a common issue in healthcare and cost billions of dollars nationwide while inflicting significant morbidity and mortality. While national attention has been paid to errors in medication dispensing issues, it remains a widespread problem. The best method to enhance patient safety is to develop a multi-faceted strategy for education and prevention. Emphasis should be put on healthcare providers working as a team and communicating as well as encouraging patients to be more informed about their medications. With a culture of safety, dispensing medication errors can be reduced.

If you are looking for a Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oklahoma to assist with your case, CONTACT US for a FREE CONSULTATION.

There is NO FEE UNTIL RECOVERY.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Heather Mitchell Oklahoma

2024-01-19T22:30:11+00:00January 15th, 2023|Articles, Medication Errors|
Go to Top